Posted 6:36 pm, January 17, 2017, by Maia Belay
Fox 8 Cleveland
NORTH ROYALTON, Ohio - There's a new push to keep drones grounded in public areas in North Royalton, much to the dismay of drone advocates. Opponents of the proposed legislation argue it makes flying drones anywhere other than front and back yards impossible.
"What's the point of that? What's the point of flying it around your house? You want to have it outside so you can explore the world around you. I think they're cool to have," said resident Cyle Gaffney.
Councilman Dan Langshaw is behind the ordinance discussed at a Tuesday safety committee meeting. The legislation would ban flying drones above or adjacent to public parks, schools, property owned by the city, school district, public utilities or other public entities.
Langshaw says he is pushing for the new rules because of surveillance concerns voiced by residents about drones getting too close for comfort.
"They thought somebody was flying a drone and they're like 'is there anything the city can do about it?' I looked into it and we have nothing on the books to regulate this," said Langshaw.
Some residents argue the Federal Aviation Administration already regulates drone use. Adding local rules only complicates an already confusing set of guidelines.
"I could see it flying over crowds and football stadiums but if you have a big open space like this [referencing a nearby park] and there's really nobody around I don't see the harm in that," said resident Gregory Loder who is considering buying a drone.
Langshaw says he wouldn't describe drone usage as problematic in the city. However he cautions additional rules only help police who are often caught in the middle of arguments about drone surveillance.
"To anyone that's a critic [arguing] 'oh the FAA can just handle it'. Well that's fine and dandy but when there are issues again people are not going to be calling the FAA. They're going to call local law enforcement then they're going to be wondering what are they going to do because we really don't have any guidance," said Langshaw.
Violators of the drone ban could be charged with a misdemeanor. Ordinance details are still being finalized.
- Crop Science
- Drone Guns
- Ground Control Points
- Public Concern
- State PArks
- Terrain Mapping
- Volume Measurement
- Wine Country
- Nov 2018
- Jun 2018
- Mar 2018
- Jan 2018
- Oct 2017
- Aug 2017
- Jul 2017
- Jun 2017
- May 2017
- Mar 2017
- Feb 2017
- First Passenger Drone Set to launch in July
- A drone software firm has hired two execs from Salesforce and NetSuite
- Drones For Farmers Makes Midwest Startup A Flying Success
- 5 things I learned taking photos with the DJI Phantom 4 Pro
- Drone Captures Wildfire Devastation in Chile
- Caterpillar invests in Airware bringing drone tech to mining and construction enterprises
- FAA: Keep your drone far, far away from the Super Bowl
- Jan 2017
- Man slapped with misdemeanor citation for flying drone near cliffside rescue in Pacifica
- Ningaloo Reef captured from sky in drone-driven health check
- Antonio's One Shot Review, Phontom 4
- What can NDVI drones do for my business? Part 1
- Falcons, drones, data: A winery battles climate change
- senseFly to Host Free ‘Ag Drone Insights’ Webinar
- Modern warfare: Death-dealing drones and ... illegal parking?
- Using a drone during the inauguration could get you fined $1,414
- North Royalton considering banning drones from public areas
- US regulators hammer down on unauthorized drone use
- In Davos, the Police Will Disarm Your Drone in a Heartbeat
- Drone's operator detained for flying near Chinese airplane
- Illegal Drone FPV Transmitters Could Interfere with Air Traffic Control
- Fields of Gold
- Drone delivers medical response