Category - Safety,Security,Legal
Posted - 01/18/2017 03:40pm US regulators hammer down on unauthorized drone use
The Federal Aviation Administration and SkyPan International in Chicago have settled a civil suit that was closely watched by the nascent commercial drone industry. The government agency said the privately held company flew its drones over New York City and Chicago from 2012 to 2014, violating its rules which barred drone operators from flying over densely populated areas without special government permission to do so. At the time, the FAA did not allow for commercial drone flights and didn't offer an exemption process yet.
The FAA originally sought a $1.9 million penalty from SkyPan in October 2015, representing the largest fine ever sought by the agency against a domestic drone operator. SkyPan, which was founded in 1988, provides aerial photography and data to real estate developers to help them with planning, sales presentations, and more.
The settlement has SkyPan agreeing to pay a much lower penalty of $200,000 to the FAA over three years, and creating public service announcements that promote safe use of drones and cooperation with the FAA within the industry this year. If SkyPan commits any violation of current FAA rules in the next year, it will pay $150,000 more. And if it fails to deliver those PSAs or adhere to other terms of the settlement, it will also pay $150,000 more.
SkyPan In a press statement, Skypan International did not admit to guilt but said it wanted to settle in order to avoid delays in other areas of its business. The company statement says SkyPan attained a so-called "333 exemption" from the FAA to fly drones for commercial purposes as soon as it could, in 2015.
The FAA-SkyPan settlement follows a case in Seattle last week where the city charged and a jury convicted a man, Paul M. Skinner, of reckless endangerment after he crashed a 2 lb. drone into a building during the June 2015 Pride Parade there. The drone hit a woman in the head, and she suffered a concussion. Skinner is facing up to one year in jail and a $5,000 fine with sentencing scheduled for Feb. 24th.
- All
- Agriculture
- Altitude
- California
- Commercial
- Construction
- Crop Science
- Drone Guns
- FAA
- GCP
- General
- Ground Control Points
- Industrial
- Instruction
- Insurance
- Legal
- Light
- Mapping
- NDVI
- Photogrammetry
- Photography
- Public Concern
- Regulations
- Reviews
- Safety
- Security
- State PArks
- Stitching
- Terrain Mapping
- Vineyards
- Volume Measurement
- Webinars
- Wildfires
- Wine Country
- Nov 2018
- Jun 2018
- Mar 2018
- Jan 2018
- Oct 2017
- Aug 2017
- Jul 2017
- Jun 2017
- May 2017
- Mar 2017
- Feb 2017
- First Passenger Drone Set to launch in July
- A drone software firm has hired two execs from Salesforce and NetSuite
- Drones For Farmers Makes Midwest Startup A Flying Success
- 5 things I learned taking photos with the DJI Phantom 4 Pro
- Drone Captures Wildfire Devastation in Chile
- Caterpillar invests in Airware bringing drone tech to mining and construction enterprises
- FAA: Keep your drone far, far away from the Super Bowl
- Jan 2017
- Man slapped with misdemeanor citation for flying drone near cliffside rescue in Pacifica
- Ningaloo Reef captured from sky in drone-driven health check
- Antonio's One Shot Review, Phontom 4
- What can NDVI drones do for my business? Part 1
- Falcons, drones, data: A winery battles climate change
- senseFly to Host Free ‘Ag Drone Insights’ Webinar
- Modern warfare: Death-dealing drones and ... illegal parking?
- Using a drone during the inauguration could get you fined $1,414
- North Royalton considering banning drones from public areas
- US regulators hammer down on unauthorized drone use
- In Davos, the Police Will Disarm Your Drone in a Heartbeat
- Drone's operator detained for flying near Chinese airplane
- Illegal Drone FPV Transmitters Could Interfere with Air Traffic Control
- Fields of Gold
- Drone delivers medical response